Harry Potter and the Sorceror’s Stone (2001)
You’ll make allowances
for the fact that it’s hard to start a franchise, and that the kids were really
little. After making allowances, though,
you’re still left with the fact that this is a really lousy movie. Children are sweet and direct, and we should
be clear and affectionate when we communicate with them. One suspects that these were not Mr.
Columbus’s methods. So heavyhanded, so
telegraphed!
This is what I'm talking about |
Frank Capra’s reaction shots gave us hints about what we were supposed to think and how we were supposed to feel. But more than that, they contained joy and generosity, an immigrant’s democratic suggestion that even the movie extra or featured bit player contained multitudes. Conversely, Columbus’s reaction shots contain all the infinite dumb and manipulative of his cinema, and of so much popular culture. And way to leave all these great actors standing around with nothing to do. Mind you, Richard Griffiths is some kind of comic genius.
"Justice!" |
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)
Not great, or even
particularly good. Better, though. “You’ve just ruined the punch line of my
Japanese golfer joke!” They are starting
to accumulate the interactions and affections that give the central conflicts
reason and resonance. There’s not enough
Ginny to really justify our concern at the climax. Come to think of it, that is also true in the
book. But there are a few felicities,
such that we are willing to make up for the shortfall ourselves. That’s as it should be. And there are hints of deeper things. Lucius.
Rickman! The kid who plays Riddle
ups the ante, and those diary parts are effectively rendered. And let’s admit it—the climax is exciting. Myth and digital technology meet pretty
felicitously in the confrontation between basilisk and phoenix. The near loss and the miraculous restorations portrayed here are more than just sentimentally satisfying.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
Cuaron |
For example: there’s a
scene early on up in the Griffindor tower when the boys are trying those
dangerously flavoured jellybeans. The
scene is pure exposition, but it’s not really planting for any subsequent
harvest, or moving us down the road at all.
It’s just nice, fun, loving. In
relationships you don’t always want plot.
You just want to be in the same room with a person. They’ve got it.
We continue to have our doubts about D. Radcliffe, but watch Mr. Grint and Ms. Watson as they start to emerge (ie. that Draco beating). The film does a terrific job handling all of the book’s important expansions and extensions. Kudos also for managing to clearly communicate Rowling’s mind-melting conclusion. The time turner is fun at first, and quantum physics at last. Very contrapuntal, challenging, beautiful. Oldman! Gambon!
Doré, David and Jonathan |
We continue to have our doubts about D. Radcliffe, but watch Mr. Grint and Ms. Watson as they start to emerge (ie. that Draco beating). The film does a terrific job handling all of the book’s important expansions and extensions. Kudos also for managing to clearly communicate Rowling’s mind-melting conclusion. The time turner is fun at first, and quantum physics at last. Very contrapuntal, challenging, beautiful. Oldman! Gambon!
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005)
The special effects are
really good in these movies. They’re
either pleasingly spectacular or truly menacing. In this way they meet two objectives,
delighting the kids and filling their eyes with wonder, or scaring them
silly. That’s actually a perfectly
acceptable, even morally viable combination for a melodrama such as this. There’s nothing wrong with shining good guys
and vivid bad guys, especially given how things will develop as the series
continues. Mind you, the compression of the (really!) long novel into this sort of long
film really hurts. The result is that like in the chamberofsecrets, we get to the high plot points too quickly, without
the percolation and lead-up that makes the high points resonate. (By this time Rowling was no longer having trouble with this in the books.)
Still, there are lots of good things here. Like the boys' long hair, the Quidditch World Cup and its really chilling interruption, Moaning Myrtle—“I was distraught!”—the continuing flowering of the estimable Miss Watson. These relationships are starting to mean something. The climactic confrontation is, once again, powerful, and Cedric’s death—"that’s my son!"—truly pitiable. (Yes, I know who played Cedric.) Plus which, it's not just the film, but the circumstances in which you encounter and absorb it. Or, consider your kids as you share this kind of thing together. It can, it should get to the point where not completely great is still way good enough.
Still, there are lots of good things here. Like the boys' long hair, the Quidditch World Cup and its really chilling interruption, Moaning Myrtle—“I was distraught!”—the continuing flowering of the estimable Miss Watson. These relationships are starting to mean something. The climactic confrontation is, once again, powerful, and Cedric’s death—"that’s my son!"—truly pitiable. (Yes, I know who played Cedric.) Plus which, it's not just the film, but the circumstances in which you encounter and absorb it. Or, consider your kids as you share this kind of thing together. It can, it should get to the point where not completely great is still way good enough.